Skip to main content
Feedback in the CLI is project-specific. That means you leave feedback on a recommendation in one project, not on the canonical paper itself. Use: 
pz feedback <project-paper-id> upvote
pz feedback <project-paper-id> upvote --json
pz feedback <project-paper-id> star
pz feedback <project-paper-id> downvote --reason not_relevant
pz feedback clear <project-paper-id>
pz feedback clear <project-paper-id> --json
clear is a subcommand, so the valid syntax is pz feedback clear <project-paper-id>. pz feedback ... --json returns the feedback object. pz feedback clear ... --json returns a small confirmation envelope because the clear endpoint returns no body. The feedback values map to the same ideas as the app:
  • upvote = useful
  • star = very useful
  • downvote = not for me
Optional downvote reasons:
  • not_relevant
  • low_quality
This matters because the same canonical paper can appear in multiple projects. One project may treat it as highly relevant, while another may treat it as a poor fit. Use CLI for the full command reference, and Why should I rate papers in the feed? for the product reason behind these signals.